Welcome!!

Become a Member of our site to be able to post and join in on the conversations!

A site for fans of The Bachelor & Bachelorette who enjoy

sleuthing and discussing Spoilers and Non Spoilers!

Join our site for updates on past contestants as well.

Discuss a variety of other shows, as well as International Bachelor and Bachelorette!


Enjoy!

Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Page 7 of 9 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by Ocrazy on Sat Sep 15, 2012 1:40 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
Nick’s Final Words

Final Words…

First off, whether you’re a fan of me now or not, thank you for watching the show! I’ve received a lot of support from both fans and cast members…both current and past. I appreciate all of it. As far as all the haters, well, maybe this will clear things up a bit. Let’s get to all the touchy subjects:

Let me start with this: Yes, I agreed to share the money with Rachel weeks prior to the filming of the finale. Yes, I really had every intention of sharing it…UNTIL…I watched the two final episodes in my hotel room the night before we filmed the finale. Leading up to episode 6 and 7, Rachel was a player in the game like anyone else. Although she just flew under the wing of Michael the whole season and did what he said, she was there and she did compete. She did NOT win any competitions either, other than the singing competition when I was her partner. So she wasn’t some big strong player in the game. She coasted through. We were forced to partner up after Michael’s departure and that’s where she made her biggest mistake. She had known him less than 10 days and was “falling in love with him” and she just couldn’t imagine going on in this competition without him. Really?? 10 days. Whatever.

I told her I was in it to the end with her. We could still win this thing together. Don’t leave. Her response was that the money isn’t worth it and she wanted to leave. Many times she said she didn’t care about the money. And again, she said it over and over later when she was all upset about not taking Jaclyn to the finale. I asked her to please stick around…I got here too. You can go see Michael in a week or so. Jaclyn and I both talked to her to get her to stick around. She blatantly told me that it wasn’t anything I said that was keeping her around, it was Jaclyn. Oh. Gee thanks. So that told me she wasn’t staying for our “partnership”…she was staying because of her friend. So at that point I had a partner…but a partner that didn’t give a crap about me.

So, sitting in my hotel room I have the opportunity to watch the final two episodes because we would need to be able to discuss them at the finale. At this point I’m planning on sharing tomorrow. Then, I see all these things that I never knew! I’m sitting there watching Rachel tell Jaclyn that she just doesn’t want to win it with me…she wants to win it with Michael. She phones Michael and tells him she doesn’t want to be my partner. She tells Jaclyn to just vote us out so she can go see him. ARE YOU SERIOUS??? I hear her say she was “backed into this partnership.” They both state that they don’t believe I deserve to be there. Why?? Who are y’all to determine who deserves to be there?? Jaclyn lasts like 2 episodes on her season of Bachelor and she’s some big shot all of a sudden. Then in the final competition, Rachel states that if Michael were her partner she’d win for sure. Wow thanks! I’m your partner now…not Michael. After watching all this, my decision was an absolute no brainer. I hear people telling me, “Karma is a bitch!” Well what about Rachel’s actions?? Quit focusing on mine and think about all that crap.

Throughout the game everyone lied, cheated, backstabbed, and voted their own friends off. And that was OK because it was “playing the game.” What makes my move any different than theirs throughout the game?? It wasn’t! It was a game and I made my move last…not during the season! It was a last minute decision based on all the crap talk I heard about me. You’re delusional if you’d want to hand 125,000 dollars to someone who just said they didn’t want to be your partner.

“I don’t want to be your partner. I want to be Michael’s.”

“Oh ok let me split this $250,000 with you.”

Feel me?

I’d like to say that when I came home from filming the main part of the season up until the finale, I spoke nothing but good things about everyone. I even defended Jaclyn and said she was actually really nice and funny…of course I hadn’t seen the things she was saying behind my back yet. I still have not stooped to trash anyone or name call…even after Rachel did to me. And after the finale, Rachel and Jaclyn really hit twitter with childish remarks…”lets start an unfollow @peetystraining movement!” Wooo awesome guys!

I never took any kind of serious emotions outside of the show. I never even had them in the show to start with…and that was my best move. I still like everybody and don’t hate any of them. A few thoughts on the contestants:

Rachel

I hear rumors of people wanting her to be the Bachelorette. I hope she gets it and wish her the absolute best in anything else she does. She’s a beautiful girl. I had zero intentions of hurting her…I just played the GAME and felt like I didn’t owe anybody anything.

Michael

As far as Michael calling me out, he had no room to do so. He just looked like a bad guy after they had it out on stage and needed to smooth things over so he came to her defense.

Jaclyn and Ed

Jaclyn and Ed had ZERO room to say anything. They could have taken the final competition seriously and won it. Had they won the competition, they would have won the whole show and the money. They would have had their pick of couples to take to the finale and would have won either way. But they didn’t take it seriously. Everybody saw their performance. Jaclyn disliked me from day 1 for no reason and I thought Ed and I got along fine…but apparently I was just “an anonymous guy in the house” to him.

Everyone Else

Just about everyone approached me and said they were glad I did what I did. They lived in the house and understood…they said they would have done the same, or at least wanted to. I think I did what many people wanted to do, but wouldn’t have the cajones to pull off. Of course they said it with a whisper and probably wouldn’t admit to it publicly…but I know it’s true.

And as far as after I pulled the Keep card, I was not gloating. Who’s not excited about winning a bunch of money? I was the underdog…and it felt good to win being the guy that nobody ever expected to see win. And to stick it those who thought they had it in the bag and thought I didn’t deserve to be there for some reason.

I came into this game and clearly stated what I was here for: the money. I kept my focus. I stayed out of the petty drama throughout the season because I knew it would hurt my chances of winning. I didn’t whore myself out. I didn’t get belligerently drunk. I played the game straight up and fair. Planned on winning and sharing until I saw what everyone really thought about me, and decided to keep it all. No foul there.

Boom.

Sincerely,

Nick Peterson

“The Schmuck with $250,000”

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

High clap Wow!! Very strong final words!! Makes me understand his decision more and more. If I was in his position and was treated like this, I would have done the same thing!! :yes:

Ocrazy

Female Posts : 276
Join date : 2012-05-22
Age : 30
Location : Netherlands

Back to top Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by ironcat on Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:03 pm

Just want to point out that it's a fallacy to assume that the only reason Nick picked Keep is because he knew Rachel would pick Share; if Rachel had picked Keep, he wouldn't have won ANY money regardless of what he picked. The only way that you win money in this game is to make sure your partner picks Share, otherwise you win nothing, so deciding what your vote will be is really a secondary concern. The only strategy that anybody who gets to the finals should have is doing whatever they can to insure that their partner picks Share; this Nick did successfully, while Rachel didn't.

ironcat

Posts : 4908
Join date : 2011-03-23

Back to top Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by albean99 on Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:23 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:He's such a tool. I'm glad he can justify it for himself but I'm not buying it.

ETA: Rachel did win a challenge with her partner. That's why she had a date where she brought Michael, Tony, & Nick.

You're not reasoning well, but instead letting your emotions get the best of you. Do you have a right to be upset the way Nick acted toward Rachel after he won? Sure, but that's it.

I've been reasoning all along but don't have to explain it in each post and really it's my opinion anyway so not sure why the criticism. We all have the right to an opinion last time I checked.

Re: A couple of points made by Avg-Joe & others. CH's blog shouldn't be used as evidence imo because he's a producer and therefore wants to defuse the situation/justify the ending and as such should be taken with a grain of salt. Also Rachel may not have been the most strategic player but she did more than just glide though the game. She had an alliance and made friends (unlike Nick who was more about exercising) both of which got them to the finals and ultimately to the f2. She even brought Nick on a date along the way. He didn't want her for a partner any more than she did him yet she was still willing to share the money. In fact the only way he knew he'd be able to get the money to himself was to make her believe he'd share with her. He'd never had chosen keep unless he was sure she'd pick share because otherwise neither of them would have gotten the money.

I don't believe Nick should have kept the money but even if he had been more of a gracious winner it wouldn't have been so bad. How he acted at that time to justify doing what he did and towards Rachel speaks to his total lack of empathy bordering on mean. He appears to have a bruised ego and bitter that the "in crowd" didn't like him yet didn't mind using them to get the win. It's not so much I'm overly sympathetic with Rachel as I am disgusted with Nick. She'll be fine and move on to better things.


"Love is the Only Reality" -Ed Lambton

albean99
Moderator
Moderator

Female Posts : 11551
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Plano, Tx

Back to top Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by Guest on Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:32 am

I still think that Nick made a fair decision choosing keep, only because the whole game relies on players constantly manipulating and lying. Michael did it, Rachel did it, Jaclyn did it, and, honestly, anyone that made it to the end did it.

What I DON'T respect is Nick treating Rachel like sh*t since the ending. Rachel has said that she has reached out to him numerous times, and he has ignored her. He is saying that he wants things to quiet down...it's just an excuse. He lied to her and betrayed her trust, and isn't willing to be a man about it. Gloating about it after he won - again, tacky. Yes, I get that you are glad about being $250,000 richer, but there is a girl sitting next to you who is crying. The fact that he showed ZERO compassion for her (and has even said I didn't feel bad for her) just shows me that he's not a good guy.

And, honestly, I don't blame Rachel (or Ed/Jaclyn) for saying the things that they did about Nick. I forgot who, but one of the contestants said that Nick literally ended up last (or second and third to last) in all of the competitions. He made absolutely no attempt to form or join an alliance. He got stuck with the person everyone hated and who was also a horrible player in competitions. He needs to own the fact that "staying out of drama" was not a strategy - he just wasn't popular enough to be involved. He got by, because people were too busy trying to get the superfans out. If they hadn't, I guarantee you that Nick, Erica, and Ryan would have been the first to leave, since they a)had no alliance and b)sucked at games.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by Guest on Sat Sep 15, 2012 1:48 am

@revo74 wrote:
@albean99 wrote:He's such a tool. I'm glad he can justify it for himself but I'm not buying it.

ETA: Rachel did win a challenge with her partner. That's why she had a date where she brought Michael, Tony, & Nick.

You're not reasoning well, but instead letting your emotions get the best of you. Do you have a right to be upset the way Nick acted toward Rachel after he won? Sure, but that's it.

Your point is valid. I is sufficient to be happy that he won and lay out the facts and truths that lead him to make the choice that he did. He didn't have to gloat. Viewers know that her argument that SHE got him to the finale isn't substantiated by her actions. Nick got to the finale because he avoided the drama sufficiently enough that everyone was focused on voting other people off, not him.

Dismissing or disregarding someone is just not the definition of partnership. Little wonder he felt as if he was on his own.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by Guest on Sat Sep 15, 2012 1:36 am

@revo74 wrote:
Avg-Joe wrote:
@dw_a_mom wrote:I can see his position.

Hard to say if I agree with it not having known the people involved personally.

I'm not a fan of sticking "it" to people out of revenge; I feel like you hurt yourself most in the long run. But there are the rare times it is the only thing to do.

If this was one of those, I don't know. I have a hard time getting there. But, then, I wasn't in that house.

My response is not directed specifically to your post - just a few thoughts that may be irrelevent to readers, nothing more. I don't see the final as being revengeful.

Production allowed the couples to see the final episodes the day before the finale. They were, however, separated and unable to speak to each other until they got on stage. Do you notice the fingerprints of manipulation? Yes, Nick had a conversation with Rachel to share the money, before he learned the rest of what she was really feeling and saying behind his back. That does change "the game". Who was really being deceitful?

How can you explain the significance of saying that you will stand by Nick to the end, but then ask your best friend to vote them off so Rachel could go find Michael? Doesn't that make Rachel 'uncommitted' and Nick reactionary so he can win the game? Where could he have found the confidence that she would even 'share' the money, when she was still, dismissing him on stage?

Three more points:

1) His criticism of Rachel's lack of "play" in the game is unjust. Standing in the shadows of a strong player (Michael) could be considered as much of a strategy in playing the game as his decision to stay out our the fray. The rest of his points were true - and it is hard to debate facts.

2) Rachel has/had no defense for her words. On tape, we were given evidence that she really did ask to be voted off, she really did disregard her partner, she really did say that money wasn't important, and she really did resist the logical game play to take the only couple into the finals that they would win against. The only responses I have heard from her and toward Nick was that he went back on his word. Did he? Who did he agree to share the money with? The woman who was suppose to be his partner? Or the woman who didn't want to be his partner? And which woman was the one that he saw when he watched those final episodes?

There was nothing Nick could do to change the fact that he was not Michael, which was the only thing that fueled Rachel's emotions with him and toward the rest of the game. After Michael, I did not see her 'play the game' - a decision that she made that cost her $125,000.

3) Chris H.'s blog slows the momentum of the 'Rachel is a victim' parade. He validates that Nick really was treated as insignificant by most everyone in the group. Combined (Rachel's emotions and being dismissed by everyone in the house), is it really any wonder why the man felt as if he was playing the game alone, without anyone to help him get the win?

No, I don't feel as if the choice was revenge. Nick just stood up to receive the prize - a prize that was pretty much given to him by everyone in the house.


I agree with everything you said except for point 1).

Rachel as a player was extremely poor and she shouldn't have even made it to the final two. I highly doubt Rachel partnered up with Michael because of strategic reasons. She had a crush on him and wanted to hook up with him. Now, why she was an extremely poor player. She was the ultimate follower. She listed to everything Michael told her and rode his coattails into the final 8. When he got eliminated she listened to him, Jaclyn and Ed to stay. Then she listened to her partner, Nick, and eliminated Jaclyn and Ed. She never lead once, just followed, followed, followed. She never had a strategy or plan of any kind on her own. She was not a good player. She was just a good looking chic who hooked up with a strong player and then had enough friends to carry her into the finals. She deserved nor earned nothing.


I understand your point. I didn't say she was a good player. I didn't say it was a shining example of strategy. I just said that some could consider riding coat tails as being as much of a strategy as any other. Nick's argument is 'weakened' by criticism toward her. He expressed sufficient facts and truths to support why he made his choice; and she offered no defense for the things she said and did to undermine his ability to trust her.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by revo74 on Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:09 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:He's such a tool. I'm glad he can justify it for himself but I'm not buying it.

ETA: Rachel did win a challenge with her partner. That's why she had a date where she brought Michael, Tony, & Nick.

You're not reasoning well, but instead letting your emotions get the best of you. Do you have a right to be upset the way Nick acted toward Rachel after he won? Sure, but that's it.

revo74

Posts : 35
Join date : 2012-09-13

Back to top Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by revo74 on Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:04 am

Avg-Joe wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:I can see his position.

Hard to say if I agree with it not having known the people involved personally.

I'm not a fan of sticking "it" to people out of revenge; I feel like you hurt yourself most in the long run. But there are the rare times it is the only thing to do.

If this was one of those, I don't know. I have a hard time getting there. But, then, I wasn't in that house.

My response is not directed specifically to your post - just a few thoughts that may be irrelevent to readers, nothing more. I don't see the final as being revengeful.

Production allowed the couples to see the final episodes the day before the finale. They were, however, separated and unable to speak to each other until they got on stage. Do you notice the fingerprints of manipulation? Yes, Nick had a conversation with Rachel to share the money, before he learned the rest of what she was really feeling and saying behind his back. That does change "the game". Who was really being deceitful?

How can you explain the significance of saying that you will stand by Nick to the end, but then ask your best friend to vote them off so Rachel could go find Michael? Doesn't that make Rachel 'uncommitted' and Nick reactionary so he can win the game? Where could he have found the confidence that she would even 'share' the money, when she was still, dismissing him on stage?

Three more points:

1) His criticism of Rachel's lack of "play" in the game is unjust. Standing in the shadows of a strong player (Michael) could be considered as much of a strategy in playing the game as his decision to stay out our the fray. The rest of his points were true - and it is hard to debate facts.

2) Rachel has/had no defense for her words. On tape, we were given evidence that she really did ask to be voted off, she really did disregard her partner, she really did say that money wasn't important, and she really did resist the logical game play to take the only couple into the finals that they would win against. The only responses I have heard from her and toward Nick was that he went back on his word. Did he? Who did he agree to share the money with? The woman who was suppose to be his partner? Or the woman who didn't want to be his partner? And which woman was the one that he saw when he watched those final episodes?

There was nothing Nick could do to change the fact that he was not Michael, which was the only thing that fueled Rachel's emotions with him and toward the rest of the game. After Michael, I did not see her 'play the game' - a decision that she made that cost her $125,000.

3) Chris H.'s blog slows the momentum of the 'Rachel is a victim' parade. He validates that Nick really was treated as insignificant by most everyone in the group. Combined (Rachel's emotions and being dismissed by everyone in the house), is it really any wonder why the man felt as if he was playing the game alone, without anyone to help him get the win?

No, I don't feel as if the choice was revenge. Nick just stood up to receive the prize - a prize that was pretty much given to him by everyone in the house.


I agree with everything you said except for point 1).

Rachel as a player was extremely poor and she shouldn't have even made it to the final two. I highly doubt Rachel partnered up with Michael because of strategic reasons. She had a crush on him and wanted to hook up with him. Now, why she was an extremely poor player. She was the ultimate follower. She listed to everything Michael told her and rode his coattails into the final 8. When he got eliminated she listened to him, Jaclyn and Ed to stay. Then she listened to her partner, Nick, and eliminated Jaclyn and Ed. She never lead once, just followed, followed, followed. She never had a strategy or plan of any kind on her own. She was not a good player. She was just a good looking chic who hooked up with a strong player and then had enough friends to carry her into the finals. She deserved nor earned nothing.


revo74

Posts : 35
Join date : 2012-09-13

Back to top Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by Guest on Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:26 pm

@dw_a_mom wrote:I can see his position.

Hard to say if I agree with it not having known the people involved personally.

I'm not a fan of sticking "it" to people out of revenge; I feel like you hurt yourself most in the long run. But there are the rare times it is the only thing to do.

If this was one of those, I don't know. I have a hard time getting there. But, then, I wasn't in that house.

My response is not directed specifically to your post - just a few thoughts that may be irrelevent to readers, nothing more. I don't see the final as being revengeful.

Production allowed the couples to see the final episodes the day before the finale. They were, however, separated and unable to speak to each other until they got on stage. Do you notice the fingerprints of manipulation? Yes, Nick had a conversation with Rachel to share the money, before he learned the rest of what she was really feeling and saying behind his back. That does change "the game". Who was really being deceitful?

How can you explain the significance of saying that you will stand by Nick to the end, but then ask your best friend to vote them off so Rachel could go find Michael? Doesn't that make Rachel 'uncommitted' and Nick reactionary so he can win the game? Where could he have found the confidence that she would even 'share' the money, when she was still, dismissing him on stage?

Three more points:

1) His criticism of Rachel's lack of "play" in the game is unjust. Standing in the shadows of a strong player (Michael) could be considered as much of a strategy in playing the game as his decision to stay out our the fray. The rest of his points were true - and it is hard to debate facts.

2) Rachel has/had no defense for her words. On tape, we were given evidence that she really did ask to be voted off, she really did disregard her partner, she really did say that money wasn't important, and she really did resist the logical game play to take the only couple into the finals that they would win against. The only responses I have heard from her and toward Nick was that he went back on his word. Did he? Who did he agree to share the money with? The woman who was suppose to be his partner? Or the woman who didn't want to be his partner? And which woman was the one that he saw when he watched those final episodes?

There was nothing Nick could do to change the fact that he was not Michael, which was the only thing that fueled Rachel's emotions with him and toward the rest of the game. After Michael, I did not see her 'play the game' - a decision that she made that cost her $125,000.

3) Chris H.'s blog slows the momentum of the 'Rachel is a victim' parade. He validates that Nick really was treated as insignificant by most everyone in the group. Combined (Rachel's emotions and being dismissed by everyone in the house), is it really any wonder why the man felt as if he was playing the game alone, without anyone to help him get the win?

No, I don't feel as if the choice was revenge. Nick just stood up to receive the prize - a prize that was pretty much given to him by everyone in the house.


Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by albean99 on Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:08 pm

He's such a tool. I'm glad he can justify it for himself but I'm not buying it.

ETA: Rachel did win a challenge with her partner. That's why she had a date where she brought Michael, Tony, & Nick.


"Love is the Only Reality" -Ed Lambton

albean99
Moderator
Moderator

Female Posts : 11551
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Plano, Tx

Back to top Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by dw_a_mom on Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:30 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Still think he acted like a schmuck. He obviously sees it the way he sees it. The rest of the cast have their own issues too. Glad it's over. Time for Revenge to start, the show of course...

Lol, how appropriate. Had not thought about that connection.


dw_a_mom

Female Posts : 3270
Join date : 2011-08-04

Back to top Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by dw_a_mom on Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:29 pm

I can see his position.

Hard to say if I agree with it not having known the people involved personally.

I'm not a fan of sticking "it" to people out of revenge; I feel like you hurt yourself most in the long run. But there are the rare times it is the only thing to do.

If this was one of those, I don't know. I have a hard time getting there. But, then, I wasn't in that house.

dw_a_mom

Female Posts : 3270
Join date : 2011-08-04

Back to top Go down

Re: Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Post by Sponsored content Today at 9:07 am


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 7 of 9 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

Nick Peterson - Bachelorette 7 - Discussion

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum