Danielle Lo (Lombard) - Bachelor 21 - **Sleuthing Spoilers**

Kashathediva wrote:

TheWrongReasons wrote:Serious question - when were these "multiple" occasions of wardrobe malfunction? I can only recall the Chris Lane concert. Please enlighten me and then I'll be happy to agree to disagree re. "intent vs. accidental" and carry on

So let me try to understand this. Someone or someones is/are to post a list of wardrobe malfunctions in order to enlighten others who disagree and then maybe those that have a differing opinion will grant the ones they differ with an agree to disagree attitude?
Personally, I don't think so.
I'm not here to change anyone else's opinion.
I think the majority of the time this lady dresses borderline import model attire for every day events. She often flirts with nip slips--the meat&geek dress is a good example, but many of her other interview videos also feature a bit too much breast.
This is my opinion. I personally do not care who else embraces this. JMO

Thanks for providing your perspective on the question.
Re. the bolded, my intended meaning was not to "grant" anyone with an agree to disagree attitude. Rather, the "then" usage was mean more for sequential purposes vs. causal purposes - like after a question is answered, I will then personally not speak of it again and just say "agree to disagree" for my own purposes/take on the matter.  I'm not putting out a request that must be met in order for me to grant the "agree to disagree" - not my intention at all.

I guess when someone approaches me with a request to do something for them (enlighten them) and then they will be happy to do something for me, it comes across as a challenge. As if I have not done enough to warrant.
If that was not your intent, I am happy to hear that and apologize for my own reaction.
When dealing in written word without the benefit of tone of voice or nonverbal behavior, things can be misconstrued.

Kashathediva wrote:I guess when someone approaches me with a request to do something for them (enlighten them) and then they will be happy to do something for me, it comes across as a challenge. As if I have not done enough to warrant.  
If that was not your intent, I am happy to hear that and apologize for my own reaction.
When dealing in written word without the benefit of tone of voice or nonverbal behavior, things can be misconstrued.

The bolded ITA with ... and I also apologize if my original query came off as contentious/a challenge because that wasn't my intention - it was literally a question for more info before I personally leave the matter.

Kels0012 wrote:

TheWrongReasons wrote:Serious question - when were these "multiple" occasions of wardrobe malfunction? I can only recall the Chris Lane concert. Please enlighten me and then I'll be happy to agree to disagree re. "intent vs. accidental" and carry on

For the record, my inference applies to ANYONE doing this, not just D Lo. I don't know if she has. I don't follow this thread closely enough to know what's been going on.

Granted, IMO she is fake. Beautiful, but clearly in it for the attention. But hey, that's the new norm right?

Thanks for your response as well.

Kels0012 wrote:Granted, IMO she is fake. Beautiful, but clearly in it for the attention. But hey, that's the new norm right?

It is, but she's next-level fake. I maintain that having 100K Instagram followers pre-show automatically means Wrong Reasons. Some would say her fan base is already large and she's not looking to expand it, but IMO that's naive. No one doesn't want more followers. The Bachelor is huge mainstream exposure. It gets her out of the import modeling subculture. Most people don't even know what "import model" means.

TheWrongReasons wrote:^I'm uncomfortable with the insinuation that people who don't finish/drop out of high school are automatically "dim" because I don't believe that's the case at all, but at any rate, she seems to have some fairly extensive post secondary education experience as listed here

Why so many classes at multiple junior colleges, with no mention of a degree? It all seems very suspicious.

Even if she's not unintelligent, per se, IMO she's one of the most vapid contestants ever. Nice girl but an airhead. I can't imagine her having any interests other than social media and looking hot--at which she excels, ftr. Frankly I'm disappointed she was cast. Again, she seems nice, but IMO she personifies the trend toward contestants with no substance. I worry that by season 25 the cast will be nothing but Instagram models.