Bachelor Australia Season 6 - Nick Cummins - SM Media #2 - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Storybook wrote:Referring to Sundy’s Post of the Instagram photo of Nick and Brittany is Nick’s face cut off in the original photo? If it is i winder if it means anything ?!!

Rikkim wrote:@HEA  I can view Brooke's facebook friends and she doesn't appear to be friends with Nick's sister, Sophie has her friends setting as private so can't see those.

rchan wrote:Well there you go... dm has released an article about britt's sister's instastory and the male voice that can be heard saying 'maybe he's not ready to settle down'

rchan wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-6163887/Is-proof-Bachelors-Nick-Cummins-DUMPED-Brittany-Hockley.html

Bobette wrote:

rchan wrote:Well there you go... dm has released an article about britt's sister's instastory and the male voice that can be heard saying 'maybe he's not ready to settle down'

You're welcome Daily Mail.  What would they do without us?  Who does the credit go to for this one - was it @bachbee?

 Is this proof The Bachelor's Nick Cummins has already DUMPED Brittany Hockley? Rumoured winner's sister shares a VERY telling video before swiftly deleting it

Brittany Hockley is the bookies' favourite to win The Bachelor.

And now there may be new evidence that the 30-year-old steals the heart of Nick Cummins - but also that their romance could already be over.

On Wednesday night, Brittany's sister Sheri shared a video to Instagram while watching  the romantic reality show, with a male companion making a very cryptic remark in the background.

As Sheri and the mystery man watched Brittany and Nick on the screen, the man remarked: 'Maybe he's not ready to settle down...'

'Maybe not', another woman could then be heard saying in the background.

It's unclear whether the woman is Brittany herself - but the commentary appears to indicate that Nick could have already dumped the brunette beauty.

The video has since been deleted from Sheri's account.

Source

Bobette wrote:

Sundy wrote:I must be deaf I actually can’t hear the full sentence

I can hear it (right at the end, just before Sheri says "you missed it!") but I'm not actually convinced it's a man - sounds like it could be an older female to me.

HEA wrote:So I am reading what was sleuthed and many kudos for your findings!

Now... I am a bit confused why Brooke was eliminated from top 2 because 2 followers were missing from her instagram account.

I do have twitter and Facebook and it happens all the time that I am unfollowed. I have no control on this.

So I wonder why it is an evidence that she returned earlier than Britt and Sophie? I must have missed another major clue outside of this surely?

I have always been fascinated when it is said that x or y returned to SM as I have never seen posts with dates but only posts saying they did and a sc of their new numbers and profile... which could have been changed the day before or the day before that.

IMO, we should consider something more concrete than someone saying they came back together as a face value because still IMO repeating it many times something and everybody think it is true. Especially if some have a favorite in mind to win

I am absolutely no pro of SM but I know how it works. For me, a contestant is back is she add or remove posts and if she add/remove friends she follows. Generally the followers number remain untouched because the purpose is to have more not less ... if it decrease, it means people decided on their own to stop following and if the number increase then yes, we know the contestant accepted the requests....

so maybe I missed something when Brooke posts and friends remained untouched and it seems 2people decided to unfollow her which yes she could also have done it I agree... but unless she had a second thought to keep them, I see no evidence she came back earlier than the other 2. Do we have evidence she liked or commented?



JMO

Bobette wrote:@HEA, as previously mentioned, Brooke was active on social media before the FRC, and before Britt and Sophie, who both returned to social media the same day, and Nick shortly after.  The evidence is just not there for Brooke being in the top 2 IMO.

Copied from Brooke's thread (posted June 19):

Bobette wrote: Just noticed Brooke was liking things on Twitter consistently from May 27/28 onwards so likely to have gone out just prior IMO.

Link: https://twitter.com/BrookeBlurton/likes

After I made the above post on her thread, the likes were deleted.  I should have screenshotted it but trust me, they were there.

stoneleigh wrote:

Bobette wrote:@HEA, as previously mentioned, Brooke was active on social media before the FRC, and before Britt and Sophie, who both returned to social media the same day, and Nick shortly after.  The evidence is just not there for Brooke being in the top 2 IMO.

Copied from Brooke's thread (posted June 19):

Bobette wrote: Just noticed Brooke was liking things on Twitter consistently from May 27/28 onwards so likely to have gone out just prior IMO.

Link: https://twitter.com/BrookeBlurton/likes

After I made the above post on her thread, the likes were deleted.  I should have screenshotted it but trust me, they were there.

I saw them too. They were still there a few days ago. She was inactive for the entire duration of filming and then back liking things every day from May 27th onwards.

HEA wrote:So I am reading what was sleuthed and many kudos for your findings!

Now... I am a bit confused why Brooke was eliminated from top 2 because 2 followers were missing from her instagram account.

I do have twitter and Facebook and it happens all the time that I am unfollowed. I have no control on this.

So I wonder why it is an evidence that she returned earlier than Britt and Sophie? I must have missed another major clue outside of this surely?

I have always been fascinated when it is said that x or y returned to SM as I have never seen posts with dates but only posts saying they did and a sc of their new numbers and profile... which could have been changed the day before or the day before that.

IMO, we should consider something more concrete than someone saying they came back together as a face value because still IMO repeating it many times something and everybody think it is true. Especially if some have a favorite in mind to win

I am absolutely no pro of SM but I know how it works. For me, a contestant is back is she add or remove posts and if she add/remove friends she follows. Generally the followers number remain untouched because the purpose is to have more not less ... if it decrease, it means people decided on their own to stop following and if the number increase then yes, we know the contestant accepted the requests....

so maybe I missed something when Brooke posts and friends remained untouched and it seems 2people decided to unfollow her which yes she could also have done it I agree... but unless she had a second thought to keep them, I see no evidence she came back earlier than the other 2. Do we have evidence she liked or commented?

JMO

Bobette wrote:@HEA, as previously mentioned, Brooke was active on social media before the FRC, and before Britt and Sophie, who both returned to social media the same day, and Nick shortly after.  The evidence is just not there for Brooke being in the top 2 IMO.

Copied from Brooke's thread (posted June 19):

Bobette wrote: Just noticed Brooke was liking things on Twitter consistently from May 27/28 onwards so likely to have gone out just prior IMO.

Link: https://twitter.com/BrookeBlurton/likes

After I made the above post on her thread, the likes were deleted.  I should have screenshotted it but trust me, they were there.

stoneleigh wrote:

Bobette wrote:@HEA, as previously mentioned, Brooke was active on social media before the FRC, and before Britt and Sophie, who both returned to social media the same day, and Nick shortly after.  The evidence is just not there for Brooke being in the top 2 IMO.

Copied from Brooke's thread (posted June 19):

Bobette wrote: Just noticed Brooke was liking things on Twitter consistently from May 27/28 onwards so likely to have gone out just prior IMO.

Link: https://twitter.com/BrookeBlurton/likes

After I made the above post on her thread, the likes were deleted.  I should have screenshotted it but trust me, they were there.

I saw them too. They were still there a few days ago. She was inactive for the entire duration of filming and then back liking things every day from May 27th onwards.

Bobette wrote:Thanks for the back-up @stoneleigh.  Note to self: always screencap!

HEA wrote:And when did Britt and Sophie were active? Which date?

June 2nd.  All the info is on the SM thread Here and their individual threads too.

HEA wrote:

Rikkim wrote:Daily Mail 'confirming' the split in a Spoiler Alert...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-6166793/SPOILER-ALERT-Bachelors-Nick-Honey-Badger-Cummins-split-winner.html

DM is reading this forum and use sleuthing and comments to feed their trend.
At least, the forum has sometimes the credit............

This said, I do believe he is single for quite some time now... or who knows with Brooke? Honest, if he pulls a mesnick, I will not be surprised (but too many rumors about picking girls in bars to be true)

Now let’s see how the prods will react to that in mags. Truth is, that the lead stay with his F1 is an exception. People should keep that in mind.

Bachbee wrote:I think no deep feelings grew between Nick and any of the girls, He picked Britt because it made the most sense and they are waiting until the finale to give it a crack. Nicks is having one night stands because they aren't official and it has meant that Britt has been able to stay friends with the girls, for now. I wish them luck but i don't see it working out

HEA wrote:We have to take DM with a mega wagon of salt. It remains a sensational gossips mags. Anything is valid to write something. Sometimes they hit jackpot and most is a pack of BS. Jmo

Bachbee wrote:Britts IG caption sounds like a dig at someone, maybe. She also posted a promotional IG story for a workout video she has done with dasha



Edit: We will have to wait and see but it looks like shade towards Sophie?? It was made very apparent that she puts her career above all else and the tags #BoatLife and #Friyay ......

Bobette wrote:

Rikkim wrote:Daily Mail 'confirming' the split in a Spoiler Alert...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-6166793/SPOILER-ALERT-Bachelors-Nick-Honey-Badger-Cummins-split-winner.html

Well, they have a source that's not one of us - so maybe it's legit.  Definitely fits with a lot of what we've sleuthed/suspected.

A source close to the production claimed on Friday: 'The Honey Badger's relationship is already over. This is obviously not what we wanted.'

It is unknown for how long Nick actually dated the 'winner' - who is widely speculated to be Brittany Hockley - before they eventually called it quits.

Source

I wouldn't be surprised if the source is TPTB themselves - give people prior warning to ameliorate the disappointment, IMO.

ETA: Fits with this too...

socialise wrote:SportsBet currently has a max bet limit of $500 for all candidates.

Other agencies (e.g. BetEasy) are higher but I can't determine what it is.

Curiously, SportsBet had a market for 'No girl to be chosen' about a week ago and they removed it within 24 hours. The odds were $6 for no girl to be chosen and they did not have an option to bet on the complementary event that a girl will be chosen. It might lend weight to the somewhat unlikely hypothesis that he is infatuated with Brooke who walks as F3, leaving him with two girls that he realises he is not as keen on so he subsequently picks no one. This ignores the adoration and lust he has shown Brittany, as well as the overwhelming SM evidence supporting her as F1, but a no-winner scenario is perhaps worthy of further investigation given this strange behaviour on SportsBet as well as (a) his non-answers when pressed on whether he found love, (b) how overt the SM spoilers have been, (c) the apparent post-filming affinity between Cass, Brittany, and Sophie, and (d) rumours of infidelity.

I also wonder whether every betting agency would really keep all bets, as they are entitled to, in the event that no one wins. Doing so would aggrieve a great many of their customers especially if they were sitting on information that no one wins.

Loulou wrote:Is it my imagination or does nicks family follow all top 4 girls  but Sophie?

Rikkim wrote:Daily Mail 'confirming' the split in a Spoiler Alert...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-6166793/SPOILER-ALERT-Bachelors-Nick-Honey-Badger-Cummins-split-winner.html