Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - #8

california90 wrote:I don't think he's cockblocking and I think its coincidence that the article came out today, but also it makes sense. It's still somewhat promoting the show/franchise (with more Bachelor news) so I would assume around this time if its tweeted/RT'd, people will click on it to read it.

 It may be a coincidence but it's still c*ck blocking... and to me that's ironic... and funny.

how is it though? am i missing something?

california90 wrote:how is it though? am i missing something?

Agreed I see nothing of that here.

The article was a little weird and embarrassing for him. I mean really this is what he chooses to write about? Maybe TPTB had a hand in this too. Just weird. JMO

Don't really think many will see it or even give it a second thought. Jodi will have their time tomorrow and I highly doubt anyone will be asking or thinking about Nick. Maybe he was mad that he was shunned?? Just a thought.

california90 wrote:how is it though? am i missing something?

I am not getting it either..... It's not like Nick owes this website......

Well, call me old fashioned. 
I don't lurve that particular phrase.
Lets see--
The timing of said article may be said to have put a damper on or deflected attention from said final couple from The Bachelorette's recent season. Kind of like "raining on the parade" so to speak. This is how it could appear or could not appear depending on your POV.

My personal feelings: usually an article is written weeks before it is in print. Timing may be a coincidence. Timing may be purposely done by the source--not the author for the timed result. 
Did TPTB have anything to do with the article being released when it was?

california90 wrote:how is it though? am i missing something?

Me too, I don't get it. Two people in a trusting loving relationship shouldn't have issue's with another member of the opposite sex a blog or anything that Nick says or does. JMHO

Not a fan of that expression either nor do I find it fitting this situation. I also can't imagine anyone cared about A/J being one of many castmembers on tv tomorrow when the idea for the article came up. It was likely because of the new season starting. Good for Nick.

That's what I feel, Andi/Josh wouldn't care about the article if by the chance they saw it.......

The show goes on tomorrow and Jodi, Seancat and other "alumni" will be there and not care about Nick.

I won't even repeat the "word." Not a fan. I thought Nick had moved on, now I am not so sure. Hope he finds what he looking for.

I don't see why or understand how that would be considered (I'm not even going to say the phrase) because really, it was a short article about getting over someone. It was favorited by 40 random people on Twitter. I guess I just don't understand that how the heck would Nick, who wrote the article, even know that Andi and Josh were going to be at the premiere tomorrow unless he creeped through Brian's comments or followed Andi on SM still?

Do I see anything wrong with the article? No. Do I think it's a tad silly given how public it all was about not wanting to let Andi go? Yes. That picture of Nick with the words "Just let it go" on there was too hilarious to not laugh a bit.