The Bachelor 20 - Ben Higgins - Sleuthing - *Sleuthing - Spoilers*- #3

Most of these girls seem to have light hair. Either blonde, ombré, light brown, blondish/brown. I guess the "majority brunettes" got eliminated already. Lol

The girl with the ombré could be Shushanna, if she's even on the show (since it hasn't really been confirmed yet.)

Chicken suit girl's hair looks too dark to be Olivia

Another closer look at screen shots and her jeans are light and not dark. They are in shade (it appears) in some of the screen shots making them appear dark. So confusing

KatCAli90 wrote:Chicken suit girl's hair looks too dark to be Olivia

How can you see any hair? Isn't this woman's head covered by the chicken costume/beak?? Lol

I do not even see hair on chicken suit girl. I see her nose or beak and shadow of nose/beak. Her head is bent aforward at the neck looking at the ground. Am I wrong here?

rhondam wrote:Another closer look at screen shots and her jeans are light and not dark. They are in shade (it appears) in some of the screen shots making them appear dark. So confusing

What do you mean?

Ugh sorry I meant the red girl...oops

A lot of these girls look pretty regular to me, not strikingly gorgeous or model or fakey types. From what I can tell from the pictures, the twins were, but hopefully they seem to be gone.

eversotrue wrote:

rhondam wrote:Another closer look at screen shots and her jeans are light and not dark. They are in shade (it appears) in some of the screen shots making them appear dark. So confusing

What do you mean?

Olivia's jeans in the screenshots from yesterday. They are faded (as shown when she first enters the frame) and in later screenshots they look to be a very dark wash. So the lighting has changed or shade from a building we don't see in the shot is a factor. I'm going to say that same factor is at work with the girls' hair both outside in the screenshots posted here yesterday and the stage lighting of the IG post posted here today. I see that with Amber's skin tone as well. JMO

KatCAli90 wrote:A lot of these girls look pretty regular to me, not strikingly gorgeous or model or fakey types. From what I can tell from the pictures, the twins were, but hopefully they seem to be gone.

Can we even really tell? I can't make out any of their facial features from the picture - up close, a girl could look like Jacklyn or Emily Maynard, it's really impossible to tell.

The fact that Juliet Litman, who is REALLY harsh on girls' looks, said that there were a lot of 9's, makes me think it's probably the latter.

chasingpavements wrote:

KatCAli90 wrote:A lot of these girls look pretty regular to me, not strikingly gorgeous or model or fakey types. From what I can tell from the pictures, the twins were, but hopefully they seem to be gone.

Can we even really tell? I can't make out any of their facial features from the picture - up close, a girl could look like Jacklyn or Emily Maynard, it's really impossible to tell.

The fact that Juliet Litman, who is REALLY harsh on girls' looks, said that there were a lot of 9's, makes me think it's probably the latter.

I thought she said there were a lot of "real world pretty" girls not "tv pretty" girls....which mean more regular looking girls, who are pretty but not drop dead gorgeous. IS that what you mean? because that't what I meant.