Search found 10 matches for ads

Arie Luyendyk Jr - Lauren Burnham - Bachelor 22 - Discussion

sosleepy wrote:I would have been more impressed if they put their money where their mouth was and actually stayed off social media. Actually denied those #sponsored incentives, and used Arie’s own millions to go on this vacay.

Alternatively, take the cash out, don’t blame them, but then don’t tell us you are staying off social media, you won’t do #ads, and you plan to lie low.

Also, it’s kind of silly to say they “deserve this” after what they went through, IMO. These are two beautiful, privileged, RICH people (in Arie’s cas) that are blessed beyond measure. They’ve gotten, and continue to get opportunities galore, for really no good reason. They don’t “deserve” squat. They are just really lucky and privileged, and that’s about it. IMO.

They said that they were limiting their SM activity. NOT staying off of it. IMO. Why should they be the only bach couple in history to not take advantage of the opportunities given....isn't that a stupid thing to do?? IMO.

So saying Lauren and Arie don't deserve squat.....then that means that NO bach couple in the history of the show deserves squat....yet we know that's not what's happened. All bach couples as well as other bach contestants have been given priveleges in one form or another. so why not them? I just don't understand that..... All IMO.

Bet2Win wrote:
umngirl wrote:
Bet2Win wrote:

Okay, thanks. The pictures of the room look like website pictures, so I have no idea if those were taken for the article, or lifted from the website. The picture outside the hotel looks anything but professional. The one inside does look like they were posing for it.

So, does the hotel have to disclose the comp as well? Who's obligation, the hotel or the person. And wouldn't People Magazine know the disclosure obligations?

Sorry for all of the questions, the things I learn from our forum.

The photos of them are credited to a pro so those were definitely for publicity.

The person or people who are receding the VIK (value in kind), which in this case is a hotel stay, are the only ones obligated to disclose. The hotel nor People have any obligation to say Arie/Lauren received something from the hotel.

Thanks!

So if Arie and Lauren put out anything, they are obligated to disclose. Since they weren't interviewed for this article, there was no opportunity to disclose. Do I have that right?

And of course, just so our discussion, which I'm thoroughly enjoying, doesn't take wings and become fact, this is all if in fact they were comp'ed.

I have received comp'ed rooms many times, I guess the difference is I'm not a celeb. I even had a penthouse comp.

I have received comp rooms and have said so on SM so ooops, guess I need to be ware of the legality police now too.....ooops.

mindless wrote:
Aunties_Love wrote:
sosleepy wrote:I remember when Jason and Molly were ridicululed too. I’ve been around the block and back with this show.

A few key differences though. Jason had no contact with Molly before he broke up with Melissa, none. Not the case here, not at all. Melissa also had one foot out the door too, as she was already with, or trying to get with Tye. Again, not the case with Becca. Becca was “so in the loop,” yet thought the phone call(s) to Lauren were just to get closure. Not so much. So not really “in the loop” after all. Jason and Molly always had one story and they stuck to it. They were, IMO, dragged through the mud unnecessarily and I thought so then too.

No one is faulting Arie (or Jason) for making the switch and having a change of heart. That’s life, and this situation is so complicated, frankly I’m surprised this has only happened 2.5 times (PLo also saw his #2 after the breakup, but that was before the show got wise to turn this post filming crap into a soap opera. ) For me, the huge difference between Jason and Arie is how they went about this. I just find these “cute” socks IG stories, sliding into DMs, calling instead of texting so as to not lead a paper trail so tacky and shady. It’s emotional cheating, no matter how you cut it, IMO. Jason, as far as we know and from everything we’ve ever been told didn’t play those games. So that, to me, is the major difference here.

I do think that it's important to say though that Arie was wanting to contact Lauren for closure. That is so and he has said so several times. That was his intent when getting in touch with her to begin with. IMO, that is getting forgotten in the fray. IMO, the fact that he DID have good intentions in the beginning with just making sure that Lauren was alright AND that he did it with Becca's blessing. As far as faulting Arie though.....I keep seeing that he is to blame for the change of heart, switching things up and how that happened. IMO, it would be far worse for him to just back off of seeing Becca and break up with her ATFR than how he did it. It did allow her to "get over" him early enough(But really that quick?? mind you maybe not the deep love)that she could have her own season so likely did her a service by breaking it up when he did. all IMO

I will agree with you though.....Melissa brought on the brakeup for the most part because of the actions she had after her plane touched back down in Dallas after filming ended. She brought on the consequences with her getting in touch with Tye immediately as he was at the airport to pick her up. IMO

Regarding the bolded, I don't think it's forgotten, people just don't believe it (hence referring to his lies). According to Courtney (in that podcast), Arie told her he checks Lauren's IG 10+ times a day. Now I don't know about you, but IMO no one checks their ex's IG obsessively all day long unless they're still in love with them. IMO there isn't a chance in hell he was contacting Lauren for closure. He wanted to know if he still had a chance IMO. When Lauren didn't call him back straight away, he posted an IG story of himself wearing the socks she gave him. Is that not an obvious message that he still had feelings for her? IMO Arie lied to Becca (and us) about his reasons for contacting Lauren, which makes him a liar and an emotional cheater. Apparently he also told Courtney that he was regretting his decision as soon as Lauren started talking at the FRC, yet he still went ahead and proposed to Becca and strung her along for nearly two months spewing all kinds of BS. He should have either A) not proposed to a woman he had no desire to marry, B) broke up with her as soon as he found himself obsessively stalking Lauren. Is that really too much to ask? JMOAA.

The point is though, he said that he was wanting to get in touch with Lauren for closure, that is what he told Becca and that is what he did to begin with so IMO, none of that is a lie. Just because it turned out differently doesn't mean that it wasn't started innocently enough, IMO. From the point of Lauren leaving the FRC, TPTB cyclone was already in action and there was nowhere to go from there with. IMO, he did the responsible thing. It allowed Becca to carry on with her season. Lauren and Arie are together and from what I can see, he is very much in love. all IMO

Mommyof2 wrote:
Diana wrote:If opinions don’t matter to them why do they limit their comments? imo

Would you like to be bombarded with many nasty comments every time you posted something? Probably not, so I don't blame them for filtering their comments.

It's their SM so IMO, it's up to the couple of how they want to manage it. I don't blame them one bit of how they want to avoid the nasty comments that are being made. Who in their right mind would belly up to the "nasty comment bar" day in and day out and not have a problem with it....LOL

tiger wrote:
Aunties_Love wrote:
sosleepy wrote:I remember when Jason and Molly were ridicululed too. I’ve been around the block and back with this show.

A few key differences though. Jason had no contact with Molly before he broke up with Melissa, none. Not the case here, not at all. Melissa also had one foot out the door too, as she was already with, or trying to get with Tye. Again, not the case with Becca. Becca was “so in the loop,” yet thought the phone call(s) to Lauren were just to get closure. Not so much. So not really “in the loop” after all. Jason and Molly always had one story and they stuck to it. They were, IMO, dragged through the mud unnecessarily and I thought so then too.

No one is faulting Arie (or Jason) for making the switch and having a change of heart. That’s life, and this situation is so complicated, frankly I’m surprised this has only happened 2.5 times (PLo also saw his #2 after the breakup, but that was before the show got wise to turn this post filming crap into a soap opera. ) For me, the huge difference between Jason and Arie is how they went about this. I just find these “cute” socks IG stories, sliding into DMs, calling instead of texting so as to not lead a paper trail so tacky and shady. It’s emotional cheating, no matter how you cut it, IMO. Jason, as far as we know and from everything we’ve ever been told didn’t play those games. So that, to me, is the major difference here.

I do think that it's important to say though that Arie was wanting to contact Lauren for closure. That is so and he has said so several times. That was his intent when getting in touch with her to begin with. IMO, that is getting forgotten in the fray.

I disagree. He has also said he was never fully in with Becca and knew as soon as Lauren walked up in Peru that he had made a mistake, and I think his intention the entire time, with the DMs, the texts, the instagram likes and stories, was to try to rectify that "mistake" by getting her back. Contacting someone you still have feelings for while engaged to someone else is not "getting closure," IMO. It's trying to reopen that door. IMO "getting closure" was a convenient excuse (lie) to feed to Becca and the media outlets because it sounds a lot better than "feeling Lauren out to make sure I get that locked down before I commit to a split with Becca." Just because he's said he was contacting Lauren for closure doesn't make it so. He also said he was hopelessly in love with Becca and would "choose her every day."

I know I don't have the right to call it a lie or an excuse but I do believe what they are saying as far as Arie wanting to give closure. I think that is how it started out and personally, I don't have a reason to call it a lie. all IMO

umngirl wrote:
Aunties_Love wrote:
umngirl wrote:

The photos from the hotel are taken by a professional photographer for promotional purposes and thus the hotel released them to People for the publicity. I haven’t seen one person or couple from the show have these types of photos taken without it being a comped stay. This looks exactly the same. If Arie and Lauren. are being comped, they have to disclose at some point. They should do it on any post from the hotel though if I’m being honest.

The other celebrities mentioned are just said to be fans of the hotel chain and that doesn’t give me indictation if they were comped stays or not. I don’t feel like trolling through their social media accounts to find out if they were comped. Lol

Every time the show has given a couple a vacation they have mentioned it. And I doubt the show would fly them to Europe on a budget airline such as WOW. It’s like a small step up from Spirit.

All JMO

I still don't understand why it is up to Arie and Lauren to specify that it is being comped when they aren't the ones that put it forth. Meaning, it is the hotel's responsibility to say whether it is comped IMO therefore it won't be Arie nor Lauren that is responsible for that and therefore, they won't get in trouble with legalities. All IMO

The FTC regulations fall on the person receiving the item, in this case the hotel stay. These are the regulations they must follow if they are being comped and/or receiving payment for staying there and posting about it. They aren’t exempt. The hotel has no obligation to share who, how many, and when they are comping stays and

So if I personally stayed at a hotel and then was comped the room for whatever reason, then went on my SM saying I had a room comped, I could be charged? I could have legal problems??

Arie Luyendyk Jr - Lauren Burnham - Bachelor 22 - Discussion

I would have been more impressed if they put their money where their mouth was and actually stayed off social media. Actually denied those #sponsored incentives, and used Arie’s own millions to go on this vacay.

Alternatively, take the cash out, don’t blame them, but then don’t tell us you are staying off social media, you won’t do #ads, and you plan to lie low.

Also, it’s kind of silly to say they “deserve this” after what they went through, IMO. These are two beautiful, privileged, RICH people (in Arie’s cas) that are blessed beyond measure. They’ve gotten, and continue to get opportunities galore, for really no good reason. They don’t “deserve” squat. They are just really lucky and privileged, and that’s about it. IMO.

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - Sleuthing Spoilers Discussion - #14

bleuberry wrote:They're coming out of the gate so strong with the shills. Two #ads today and it's only 9:30 AM .

OMG I just posted this on the general discussions thread! I don't think I have ever seen anything like this before from a couple. He had a website with quite a lot of well thought out merchandise ready to go the practically the minute they were announced. Today they are pimping Lord and Taylor price matching and handing out roses at a store and she is pimping Copper to sell toys for Target on her Instagram. I am kind of shocked. I mean, I expect them all to shill these days, but this just seems excessive and honestly, it feels greedy. Even the unemployed cast members weren't quite this aggressive out of the gate, let alone two professionals making six figure salaries.

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - Sleuthing Spoilers Discussion - #14

Alanna wrote:
ReneeM wrote:
bleuberry wrote:They're coming out of the gate so strong with the shills. Two #ads today and it's only 9:30 AM .

Making up for lost time . She did go a really long time before posting her first.

All the shilling makes it look like it's a fake relationship. I don't know if that's true but that's the vibe imo.

I have to wonder why any of us care; almost every one shills. Vanessa had a recent Diffey eyewear deal going on same as JoJo, so if Rachel is shilling *shrug* it makes no never mind to me. Does this make Rachel any different than any other Bachelorettes? Should we say that JoJo's relationship was fake? Whether they last or not is immaterial to me. I enjoyed watching them connect on her season and wish them all the luck in the world.

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - Sleuthing Spoilers Discussion - #14

Alanna wrote:
ReneeM wrote:
bleuberry wrote:They're coming out of the gate so strong with the shills. Two #ads today and it's only 9:30 AM .

Making up for lost time . She did go a really long time before posting her first.

All the shilling makes it look like it's a fake relationship. I don't know if that's true but that's the vibe imo.

What does one have to do with the other? Jojo did one for L'Oréal less than 24 hrs ago.
Don't all the Bach couples do it? Why should Rachel be any different?

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - Sleuthing Spoilers Discussion - #14

Alanna wrote:
ReneeM wrote:
bleuberry wrote:They're coming out of the gate so strong with the shills. Two #ads today and it's only 9:30 AM .

Making up for lost time . She did go a really long time before posting her first.

All the shilling makes it look like it's a fake relationship. I don't know if that's true but that's the vibe imo.

Yeah, they're being idiots and completely oblivious to public perception.

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - Sleuthing Spoilers Discussion - #14

ReneeM wrote:
bleuberry wrote:They're coming out of the gate so strong with the shills. Two #ads today and it's only 9:30 AM .

Making up for lost time . She did go a really long time before posting her first.

All the shilling makes it look like it's a fake relationship. I don't know if that's true but that's the vibe imo.

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - Sleuthing Spoilers Discussion - #14

ReneeM wrote:
bleuberry wrote:They're coming out of the gate so strong with the shills. Two #ads today and it's only 9:30 AM .

Making up for lost time . She did go a really long time before posting her first.

Good for her! Over $20k in less than an hour...not a bad days work!

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - Sleuthing Spoilers Discussion - #14

bleuberry wrote:They're coming out of the gate so strong with the shills. Two #ads today and it's only 9:30 AM .

Making up for lost time

. She did go a really long time before posting her first.

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - Sleuthing Spoilers Discussion - #14

They're coming out of the gate so strong with the shills. Two #ads today and it's only 9:30 AM

.