Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - Episode 9 - July 24 - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

pbmax wrote:

Alanna wrote:I don't think she can let Peter go because I don't think producers would let her have Eric as f2 against Bryan. It's unrealistic imo.

Well I think she lets both Eric and Peter go, listen to what she is saying while holding that rose in her hand...do they hold the rose in there hand while giving the speech.

mindless wrote:I'm sure they'll "resolve" this issue somehow in two weeks, since he's still there afterwards. I have to say, I agree with Peter that an engagement is a promise to marry, not to just date seriously. I wish it wasn't a requirement on this show. Rachel wants that bling though, so oh well. I don't think it makes Peter selfish that he doesn't want to compromise on this issue. It would be far more selfish to agree to propose even if he's not sure and then risk being chosen and changing his mind. I for one appreciate his honesty, even when it's not what Rachel wants to hear. I do wish he was more comforting though, that shoulder squeeze was odd. JMO.

Rachel Lindsay @TheRachLindsay
This was the chopped and screwed version of my response. Obviously Engagement means marriage 2 me. It's all I talk about #theBachelorette

T.J. Holmes @tjholmes
Engagement doesn't mean marriage to her?  Am I hearing this right? #TheBachelorette @TheRachLindsay

Rachel Lindsay @TheRachLindsay
I want somebody who wants what I want AND wants it with me...Stay tuned to see who I found that w/ on the finale 2 weeks!#theBachelorette

Aria wrote:

mindless wrote:I'm sure they'll "resolve" this issue somehow in two weeks, since he's still there afterwards. I have to say, I agree with Peter that an engagement is a promise to marry, not to just date seriously. I wish it wasn't a requirement on this show. Rachel wants that bling though, so oh well. I don't think it makes Peter selfish that he doesn't want to compromise on this issue. It would be far more selfish to agree to propose even if he's not sure and then risk being chosen and changing his mind. I for one appreciate his honesty, even when it's not what Rachel wants to hear. I do wish he was more comforting though, that shoulder squeeze was odd. JMO.

I think he's being reasonable enough, but then he better stick to his word. He didn't feel comfortable saying ILY and getting engaged in this short time frame on the Bachelorette, so he better not when he's the Bachelor. And if he does, he must 100% marry her since he would never propose unless he was certain with all of his heart. I just don't see either scenario happening, which is why I think he's full of bull. Would love to be proven wrong though! IMO.

mindless wrote:I'm sure they'll "resolve" this issue somehow in two weeks, since he's still there afterwards. I have to say, I agree with Peter that an engagement is a promise to marry, not to just date seriously. I wish it wasn't a requirement on this show. Rachel wants that bling though, so oh well. I don't think it makes Peter selfish that he doesn't want to compromise on this issue. It would be far more selfish to agree to propose even if he's not sure and then risk being chosen and changing his mind. I for one appreciate his honesty, even when it's not what Rachel wants to hear. I do wish he was more comforting though, that shoulder squeeze was odd. JMO.

coolangel wrote:

AllAboutLove wrote:

makeover wrote:This season has dragged on long enough and there is no suspense whatsoever. I just want FRC already.

Peter is the definition of a game player, IMO. If Rachel can't see through that, I have no words.

Exactly this! Peter is the player IMO. It's all a game to him IMO except he does it under the guise of "I am just being real". Please... being real would be leaving like Brooks, not spinning wheels just to be the next bachelor  JMO

ITA with both the posts! He legit reminds me of secret f*ckboi's who play the 'I'll commit when we get there (which is never)' and women fall for it thinking they are being honest and real and are worth being patient over.

All JMO