Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - Episode 10 FRC - Aug 7 - *Sleuthing Spoilers* #3

ElonM wrote:Rachel is been eaten alive on SM. She deserves this for being bitter and petty.

I guess social media should get to eating Peter alive too, since he's been bitter and petty for the past two months on social media! But I guess that's the difference between the two: when Rachel does it, at least she does it in the open and owns up to it. Peter, on the other hand, does it on social media and then acts like a contrite gentleman on TV, like the two-faced hypocrite that he is. IMO.

She did imitate, the difference is Andi didn't beg for a ring.

Peter is not Rachel. Rachel stated that if she was in F2 and Nick proposed to her she would have accepted. Peter has said the opposite about not wanting to propose on the show. So totally not the same things, IMO.

Aria wrote:

ElonM wrote:Rachel is been eaten alive on SM. She deserves this for being bitter and petty.

I guess social media should get to eating Peter alive too, since he's been bitter and petty for the past two months on social media! But I guess that's the difference between the two: when Rachel does it, at least she does it in the open and owns up to it. Peter, on the other hand, does it on social media and then acts like a contrite gentleman on TV, like the two-faced hypocrite that he is. IMO.

They are all hypocrites. People just put them on a different level. imo

Beautiful couple! I wish them a lifetime of happiness  


https://instagram.com/p/BXhTYAljJTm/

rosesrREd wrote:

jalkire wrote:I don't think she was trying to sabotage him being the Bachelor. I think she was being honest and using his own words about needing more time. I'm really confused on why people keep saying she was being bitter, didn't Peter say he needed more time with her, so it would only make sense to think he would need more time if he was the bachelor.

She dumped Peter for wanting "more time" and then went on to say her and Bryan "needed more time" to cultivate their relationship.  To me, she was being hypocritical, and to some, it seemed she only was after a ring.

She dumped Peter for not willing to take leap of faith...Rachel said over and over that getting in engaged did not mean getting married immediately. But was she suppose to believe that it would get there eventually? She didn't think so. Look neither of them wanted to comprise and in the end that was what proved they were not right for each other.

sfrank wrote:

rosesrREd wrote:

jalkire wrote:I don't think she was trying to sabotage him being the Bachelor. I think she was being honest and using his own words about needing more time. I'm really confused on why people keep saying she was being bitter, didn't Peter say he needed more time with her, so it would only make sense to think he would need more time if he was the bachelor.

She dumped Peter for wanting "more time" and then went on to say her and Bryan "needed more time" to cultivate their relationship.  To me, she was being hypocritical, and to some, it seemed she only was after a ring.

She dumped Peter for not willing to take leap of faith...Rachel said over and over that getting in engaged did not mean getting married immediately. But was she suppose to believe that it would get there eventually? She didn't think so. Look neither of them wanted to comprise and in the end that was what proved they were not right for each other.

I agree, they weren't right for one another, especially in this expedited environment.

Cocoasneeze wrote:So Peter needed more time with one woman, but will be OK finding one woman out of 30 women in the same amount of time? Rachel just called out his hypocrisy using his own word, IMO.

Exactly! You see how quickly he's turning it around talking about now he's open for love. He just used his reservation about a proposal an excuse. The sorry ******. That's what Rachel is hurt about and tears

source

sfrank wrote:

rosesrREd wrote:

jalkire wrote:I don't think she was trying to sabotage him being the Bachelor. I think she was being honest and using his own words about needing more time. I'm really confused on why people keep saying she was being bitter, didn't Peter say he needed more time with her, so it would only make sense to think he would need more time if he was the bachelor.

She dumped Peter for wanting "more time" and then went on to say her and Bryan "needed more time" to cultivate their relationship.  To me, she was being hypocritical, and to some, it seemed she only was after a ring.

She dumped Peter for not willing to take leap of faith...Rachel said over and over that getting in engaged did not mean getting married immediately. But was she suppose to believe that it would get there eventually? She didn't think so. Look neither of them wanted to comprise and in the end that was what proved they were not right for each other.

She dumped Peter because he was a liar and user. Peter didn't want her and she didn't want him.

Beautiful post by Bryan. Rachel is so lucky

https://instagram.com/p/BXhT9_pH5cU/

Here is my Question:
The 1st conversation Bryan had with Rachel , he laid out what he was looking for and said he was looking for something serious and didn't want to waste her time. Rachel said that's exactly what she was looking for too--SO why is Bryan being accused of telling her what she wants to hear? Why is a bad thing that they both wanted the same thing , had the same goal and talking about how to achieve that goal ?.
When Peter and Rachel were talking about their gaps --nobody said Peter is telling her what she wants to hear