Bachelorette Australia - Season 4 - Ali Oetjen - Episodes - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Enough wrote:The GD in Episode 6 has 10 men. No Daniel.

So in Episode 5, Ivan gone in double date and Daniel gone in RC

AllAboutLove wrote:Next week's Ep 5 & 6 (updated the Filming Schedule)

- still need to figure out who gets SDs in Ep 5 & 6 
- confirm DD (2on1) with Bill and Ivan is in Ep5 or 6? 


Episode 5 (Wed Oct 24)  *12 men remaining*
Synopsis: Ali has made no secret that she sees children in her future. Wondering who will be her perfect match, she invites the Bachelors on a group date to discover how they bond with little ones.
DD 2on1 = Bill and Ivan (Ivan not in F10 so leaves either on this date or at RC - is it possible it may happen in Ep 6?)
GD (filmed July 19) = 6 men (Todd, Taite, Charlie, Dan, Peter, Rob) parenting theme group date at Galston; challenge involved the suitors demonstrating their parenting abilities with a bunch of kids. First the suitors had to put together a kids bike as the anxious youngsters waiting impatiently for the moment to ride their new bikes. Next Ali refereed while the guys played a game of football with the kids (here)
SD/Other? 
RC = 10 men remaining ?

Episode 6 (Thurs Oct 25)  
Synopsis: With Ali keen to change her ways and not fall in love so fast, she decides she needs some help to see who is being true to their word and who is telling her what she wants to hear.
SD =  Taite or Todd or ??? (whoever is on this date is also on the GD if 10 men remain in previous ep)
GD (filmed July 24) = 10 men (Taite, Todd, Bill, Dan, Rob, Charlie, Daniel, Peter, Danny, Paddy) on group date where she gets help from her sister and friend who rate the men ; Ali's sister and friend at the bette mansion (here, here)

they have every right to question her, IMO.

AllAboutLove wrote:

they have every right to question her, IMO.

Then she has every right to question them too and their pasts. 

She never dated them nor they her. It's her past. They have pasts too. 

How about if everyone's pasts get put on blast on the show. Everyone takes a lie dectector.

Everyone has ALL their exes come out and tell everything wrong they all did.

She nor they don't owe anything to the public about their pasts.

Sprite wrote:

AllAboutLove wrote:
She nor they don't owe anything to the public about their pasts.

I get that, but unfortunately that is part of the show. If they don't want their past dug up or used as a plot point they should stay off of reality tv!

Sundy wrote:I actually, surprisingly felt a little sorry for Nathan last night. I’m sure he wasn’t the only one gossiping. Admittedly they shouldn’t be dosresting anyone but I think it is unrealistic to think that it wouldn’t be raised. I actually probably think Paddy’s ‘fit as f’ comments are equally as offensive but that seems to have passed the sniff test

Bobette wrote:

Sundy wrote:I actually, surprisingly felt a little sorry for Nathan last night. I’m sure he wasn’t the only one gossiping. Admittedly they shouldn’t be dosresting anyone but I think it is unrealistic to think that it wouldn’t be raised. I actually probably think Paddy’s ‘fit as f’ comments are equally as offensive but that seems to have passed the sniff test

@Sundy same.  It reminded me of when Brett got kicked off Bachelor in Paradise.  To me it seemed Nathan wasn't sure if she was serious or not, nor what he was allowed to say in reply to her questions.  

IMO Nathan was a scapegoat and by sending him home they can say the issue has been "dealt with" and portray Ali as some kind of empowered goddess when really IMO she just can't handle the truth.

I'd say a fair few of the guys were involved in the discussion, probably including some of her favourites judging by the guilty looks being thrown around at the cocktail party. Funny how only Nathan went.

The fact that Nathan was almost immediately confirmed in the media as being on BiP is also suspicious to me.  Not sure if it was TPTB's way of appeasing him, or the public, but I thought it was interesting.